Showing posts with label times of israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label times of israel. Show all posts

Thursday, November 9, 2023

TIMES OF ISRAEL - One lesson from Kristallnacht is positively terrifying after Oct. 7


One lesson from Kristallnacht is positively terrifying after Oct. 7

Eighty five years ago, on November 9, 1938, the world faced a massive turning point. A dress rehearsal for mayhem proved that a war could be waged against innocent Jewish civilians, where the nations of the world would not raise a finger to stop it. What happened on Oct. 7 was astoundingly similar. A meticulously coordinated campaign of violence was directed against the Jews, only this one even more destructive than Kristallnacht, and the nations of the world, including the Jews’ very own highly militarized state, were powerless to stop it. And after only a few days, the world was ready to tolerate what happened as if it had been just another skirmish – and to move on, with almost no repercussions for the perpetrators. Nothing to see here.

Oct. 7 was way beyond the pale and was utterly unique, but it didn’t happen without a long period of incubation. For decades terrorists have been scaling up attacks on Israelis. Each one was just a little more lethal and outrageous. I can recall the days when a single rocket sent by Palestinians across the Lebanese frontier could lead to massive retaliation – even a war in 1982. There was a time when a few rocks thrown by teenagers were called an Intifada and Rabin swore to break their bones. Saddam Hussein’s 42 scuds over the course of a few weeks in 1991 were considered a massive war crime. But by 2023, Hamas was shooting off that many rockets at civilian targets in the time it takes to order a falafel.

But even from the standards of the most recent Israel-Hamas wars, Oct. 7 was a huge leap. And now it has established a new baseline, a precedent. The pot with the frog is now boiling. What had been utterly unimaginable has now become inevitable. Once it has happened, it can easily happen again, as Hamas leadership has already boasted. We have a new benchmark for evil. And as in 1938, the world did not do more than send a round of condolence cards. Some have done more, like the US, but even they are now being pressured to roll back their support. Unless the IDF is able to finish its work, a new cycle of violence will have been started, one starting at Defcon 3, and from there it will only intensify. On Oct 7, Hamas declared Open Hunting Season on Jews, and Jewish blood was spilled across the world, even in L.A.

We’ve seen this movie before, in black and white, in1938.

Historian Alan E. Steinweis writes:

The Kristallnacht was a monumental development in Nazi anti-Jewish policy for several reasons. It was the single instance of large-scale public and organized physical violence against Jews in Germany before the Second World War. It unfolded in the open, in hundreds of German communities, even those with very few Jewish residents, and took place partly in broad daylight. It inaugurated the definitive phase of so-called Aryanization: the coerced expropriation of German-Jewish property… [It was] the culmination of a brutal trajectory.

Despite this massive pogrom, the world stood by and the German people acquiesced. Paris, London and Washington DC condemned the riots, but took little action. Some ordinary Germans backed the pogrom while others were indifferent. There were also some public condemnations of Kristallnacht (to the extent that such things were possible in Hitler’s Germany). But by that point, the people were powerless to mount significant resistance.

On the fiftieth anniversary of the event, The New York Times surveyed historians on the significance of Kristallnacht in relation to the Holocaust as a whole. The article noted that, while many Americans voiced shock at the terrible events of Kristallnacht, not long afterward, when Senator Robert F. Wagner of New York proposed to stretch immigration quotas so that about 10,000 Jewish children could escape Nazi violence and come to the United States, the effort was defeated in a Congressional committee.

Ultimately, all that happened in response to this deadly pogrom was that America recalled its ambassador after hesitating for four days. That was the strongest international gesture, despite all the front-page headlines. As evil as the Nazis designs were – and as deadly as they would turn out to be – to this point there had not been massive physical violence directed toward the Jewish population.

Kristallnacht changed all that. I’m not suggesting that Oct. 7 will necessarily be the prelude to another Holocaust. But on Oct. 6, who could have imagined Oct 7? After October 7, one can easily imagine November 9. And it’s staggering to realize that after Kristallnacht, despite a virulent antisemitism all over the world, including America, there were no anti Jewish rallies of the sort we’ve seen post Oct. 7.

The world has muscle memory for Jew hatred. Spurred on by Kristallnacht, it metastasized into something much more dangerous and violent. The same muscle, put on ice for 80 years, has been exercised once again.

Was Oct. 7 an aberration that led to the elimination of Hamas and a sudden eruption of sanity?

Or, as history suggests, was it the moment when the world allowed the unimaginable to become inevitable?

Friday, February 10, 2023

My annual Super Bowl prediction, using Jewish sources (Times of Israel)


FEATURED POST

My annual Super Bowl prediction, using Jewish sources

Both eagles and chiefs appear in this week's Torah portion, but which will prevail on Sunday? (I'm not endorsing gambling, but I'm nearly always right)

It should be mentioned up front that I do not endorse excessive gambling, and that past performance is not indicative of future results. That said, my Super Bowl predictions are almost always right.

Here is the case for Philly:

In the Bible, the eagle is referenced over 20 times. In most cases, this majestic bird is seen as a warrior, swooping down on its prey (see Deuteronomy 28:49, Job 9:26 and Jeremiah 48:40, for a few examples). The eagle is also seen as unclean and detestable (Leviticus 11:13), maternal and protective (Deuteronomy 32:11 and, most famously, and in this week’s portion, Exodus 19:4), youthful (Psalms 103:5), bald (Micah 1:16) and mysterious (Proverbs 30:19).

The Talmud emphasizes the eagle’s speed and agility, and its spread wings have come to symbolize arms outstretched in prayer. The Hebrew word for eagle is “Nesher,” which has also been an honorary title for a great person. Maimonides was called “ha-Nesher Hagadol,” the “Great Eagle.”

There are lots of words for “chief” in Jewish sources, all of them more politically correct than the Kansas City team’s name. The most common are “Rosh” (head) and “Sar,” (chief officer).

Amazingly, eagles and chiefs BOTH appear in this week’s Torah portion, Yitro.

Two verses are most revealing:

Ex. 19:4: “You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to Me.”

Ex. 18:21, also in this week’s portion, says this“You shall also seek out from among all the people capable men who fear God, trustworthy men who spurn ill-gotten gain. Set these over them as chiefs of thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens, and let them judge the people at all times. Have them bring every major dispute to you, but let them decide every minor dispute themselves. Make it easier for yourself by letting them share the burden with you.”

Both of these verses are central to the narrative. One speaks of Moses’ need to delegate leadership, a recommendation made by his father in law Jethro. The other leads up to the climactic moment when the Ten Commandments were to be given at Mt. Sinai.

What are these verses trying to tell us?

The “chief” passage seems to be indicating that K.C., like Moses, will do better if they share the burden – and the football. If Mahomes hands off to his running backs more often than expected and, when he throws, spreads the ball around to all his receivers, he’ll thrive.

It should be mentioned that just as with the chieftains in our portion, arrows mentioned in our sources have, of course, nothing to do with Native American stereotypes. Sometimes an arrow is just an arrow.

And sometimes it is not. Among the many arrowheads archaeologists have unearthed in Israel, the one pictured here might be the most historically and emotionally significant. It was found in a Jerusalem home in the the upper city, just across from the ancient temple. An aristocratic Jewish family lived there at the time of the Roman destruction in the year 70 CE. It’s known as the Burnt House because it was destroyed at the same time the temple was burning. This spear was found just beyond the reach of a skeletal hand – the hand of a woman who might have reaching for a weapon that would allow her to defend herself. But all was lost. The Romans, whose symbol was the eagle, vanquished our people using those weapons of choice, spears and arrows. Without protection under God’s wing, the woman was unable to fend off those arrows – and protect her loved ones.

Eagles can be divine messengers of courage and resilience or symbols of an evil empire. We’ve seen both throughout history. Ben Franklin had no great love for the eagle (he preferred the turkey as our national symbol), calling it “a bird of bad moral character” that “does not get his living honestly” because it steals food from the fishing hawk and is “too lazy to fish for himself.”

Yes, fish gotta swim… but birds gotta fly!

I’ve seen enough. Eagles will fly to victory by a field goal.

And maybe then we’ll exchange that annoying Tomahawk Chop for some good old fashioned Philadelphia razzing.

Wednesday, February 1, 2023

Flexibility, fluidity and Fauda (Times of Israel)


FEATURED POST

Flexibility, fluidity and Fauda

There are six Hebrew words for peace, but not a single word for status quo, a time--tested method for preserving it   
Like so many, I am addicted to the Israeli TV series Fauda, now playing internationally on Netflix. The fourth season does not disappoint, unless, that is, you are a strict tribal truther who refuses to to accept nuance and the common humanity even of sworn enemies, amidst the continually unfolding tragedy that is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This week on the ground in Israel, sadly life is imitating art, with new spasms of violence in Jenin and Jerusalem, with more undoubtedly to come.

For those whose perspectives have become ossified by the numbing pain, there is little tolerance for Fauda, a show that thrives on fluidity. Having binge-watched the new season this week, I came away amazed at how interchangeable the Jewish and Arab characters are, as they flow from language to language, often in mid-sentence, from tragedy to tragedy, from Jerusalem to Jenin, from Brussels to Beirut, from love to revenge and back to love again. The greatest misfortune is how the characters rarely see just how similar they are to those they are killing. It’s hardly a spoiler to announce that the terrible cycle is never broken, even as new generations are born. The births seem tragic, not hopeful, because there is little hope of surmounting the eternal, unending, unbending stuck-ness, a status quo borne of inertia rather than compromise.

But transcending a plot that is replete with tragedy, there is one glimmer of hope. This Israeli show that glides effortlessly from Arabic to Hebrew, from Beirut to Tel Aviv, is Netflix’s number one show in Lebanon and highly rated throughout the Arab world.

Everyone is watching. and that counts for something. On some level, we’re all speaking the same language.

And that language is not Hebrew. Fauda is an Arabic term employed by Israelis, meaning chaos. But it’s not just any old chaos, otherwise the Hebrew term balagan, which connotes disarray, might have sufficed. But even that’s borrowed from Russian. And balagan doesn’t come close to conveying the deeper meaning of fauda, which implies that the mess resulted from a mess-ive failure.

A fauda requires not only an instant recalculation – and battlefield adaptation is something Israeli soldiers do very well.  It also calls for an instinctive humility, the ability to overcome the barriers of ego and self criticize. Instantly. Israelis – and most of us – do not excel at the “We really blew it” part.

And so evidently, there is no Hebrew word for fauda.

With that in mind, I scanned the Hebrew front pages last week for other words that remain untranslated into the Holy Tongue.

Last Wednesday’s Ha’aretz has on the front page, both in Hebrew and in its English edition, two untranslated words that jump off the page.

First, the term status quo. The headline translates to “Netanyahu Promises Jordanian King to Preserve the Status Quo on the Temple Mount.”

It’s odd and a little disconcerting that there is no Hebrew term for status quo. The status quo on the Temple Mount has been sacrosanct since the Six-Day War, and it is under threat right now, as this article attests (and Jordan’s king fears). Preserving the status quo with regard to holy places enables the Muslim authorities to supervise worship while Israel maintains security while (usually) respecting the sanctity of the place for Muslims. That arrangement has allowed for an uneasy but stable peace to prevail for over half a century. By resolving not to resolve the conflict unilaterally, the parties allow the status quo to become a baseline for future negotiation – albeit an imperfect one – forged in compromise but durable enough to hold things in place until the time is right to address prevailing issues constructively and incrementally. That status quo is so important to Israel’s continued survival that it’s hard to believe there is no Hebrew word for it. There are six Hebrew words for peace, but not a single one for this time-tested method for preserving it.

Acceptance of the status quo has not only kept peace between Israel and Muslim authorities, but it has also allowed Israel to preserve its own fragile balance between religion and state among the Jewish population, particularly in areas of Shabbat and holiday observances, kashrut, family status, education and the military. So, for example, in some cities buses run on Shabbat and in some they don’t. Compromises were made back in the early years, and once that happened, things were kept basically the same, for the sake of peace. It was all about finding some middle ground that everyone could live with, even if no one was completely happy with the arrangement. At its best, status quo allows the pot to simmer just long enough for fresh ideas to germinate. It should not be a prescription for eternal ossification. In some cases adjustments to status quo policies need to be made for compelling moral reasons, especially regarding basic human rights, but allowing Jewish prayer atop the Temple Mount has never been cause to upset the status quo – until now.

Prime Minister Netanyahu traveled all the way to Jordan to assure King Abdullah that he would preserve the status quo. But will he? Watch out for what happens on Passover, when right wing extremists will undoubtedly try to stir the pot by sacrificing a goat in the shadow of Al Aqsa. It’s been tried before, just last year, in fact. The police have stopped these attempts in the past, But now the inmates are running the asylum. The police are supervised by Itamar Ben Gvir, the right wing zealot who has already made his first official visit atop the Mount, and the Temple Mount movement is planning for a robust return of Jews to the site. And this year, Passover, Easter and Ramadan all coincide. Circle the first week of April on your calendars and stock up on canned goods. Things could get very tense around the world.

Still, as with fauda, there is no Hebrew word for status quo.

And on the very same front page, another word lacks an authentic Hebrew translation.

In a story, about a transgender child being removed from a religious school because of parental pressure, you can see that the term transgender is also transliterated directly from English to Hebrew. There is no Hebrew word yet for “transgender,” just an English loanword, like טלפון, ×’’ינס and ביי (telephonejeans and bye) – and like fauda and status quo.

In this situation, though, I think I’d rather not see the Israeli language authorities take a crack at creating an organic Hebrew word for trans, considering that the best they’ve been able to do with LGBTQ is homo. I’m happy just keeping things as they are. Let English carry the load on this one.

The fact that the Hebrew language can’t handle gender fluidity, historical flexibility, (which maintaining the status quo requires), or personal reassessment, suggests that Judaism’s sacred language might have a problem with fluidity in general.

The Hebrew word for fluidity is × ְ×–ִילוּת (“n’zilut“), which comes from “nazal,” “to ooze.” There’s another word as well: זרימה, (“zrima,”), which comes from the word “zerem,” a biblical term for downpour (see Psalm 77:18). Somewhere in between those two words, in between the oozing and the gushing, between stagnation and revolution, there is a simple, flowing stream – a fluidity that recognizes that nothing is static and unchanging, not regarding gender nor ownership of sacred spaces. Because of that, we need to be respectful of people who pray in different ways, for whom the very same location might have a very different history – different but also holy.

Fluidity is a key to understanding how, over the coming few weeks, the Torah cycle takes us from the blood-soaked banks of the Nile to the rising and ebbing tides of the Red Sea, and from the depths of winter’s frost to the first oozing of sap on Tu B’Shevat.

In some ways, Israelis have always been very good at going with the flow. But with the current government’s approach to both the Temple Mount and LGBTQ, and so many other areas, there has been a considerable hardening of the arteries. That needs to change quickly. As Pharaoh discovered, nothing good comes from a hardened heart.

But Fauda is Netflix’s number-one show in Lebanon and a hit throughout the Arab world – and beyond. That portends a fluidity among the peoples of the world, and a recognition of our common humanity, that just might upend the tragic “statoos quo” some day.

And it just might save us all.