Here is how The Jerusalem Post anticipates Israel's defense plan at the Hague:
What will Israel's case be?Israel will be able to show it has instituted mitigation measures in its military campaign. “Israel's extensive advance warning and other measures to mitigate harm to Gaza civilians make clear that Israel's goal is not to commit genocide but, far from it, to instead minimize Palestinian civilian casualties while lawfully exercising Israel's rights to rescue its hostages, apprehend the October 7 perpetrators, and ensure that Israel's population is secure from further attacks,” he said. Israeli spokespeople have also suggested that Israel will seek to turn the tables, and level charges of genocide against Hamas. “The Hamas terrorist organization — which is committing war crimes, crimes against humanity and sought to commit genocide on 7 October — is responsible for the suffering of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip by using them as human shields and stealing humanitarian aid from them,” the Foreign Ministry's Hayat said in a statement.
So Israel's actions in Gaza have not been genocidal. But that's a rather low bar. I'm not a murderer. Mazal tov. It's a Pyrrhic victory to be able to make that claim, especially if Israel's own ministers are simultaneously undermining the country's credibility as a civilized nation. See Friday's story in the Washington Post, "Israeli calls for Gaza's ethnic cleansing are only getting louder"
.. .Far-right figures like finance minister Bezalel Smotrich and national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir... do little to hide their vision of an ethnically-cleansed Gaza. “What needs to be done in the Gaza Strip is to encourage emigration,” Smotrich said in an interview Sunday with Israeli Army Radio. “If there are 100,000 or 200,000 Arabs in Gaza and not 2 million Arabs, the entire discussion on the day after will be totally different.” Ben Gvir separately called for the de facto forced migration of hundreds of thousands out of Gaza.
No American Jew should be asked to defend statements like that. In fact, we should stand in public protest against them.
We just need to learn how to do that and to defend Israel from accusations of genocide and war crimes at the same time. Not an easy task.
Because we are dealing with a heavily charged environment where no one is listening to nuanced arguments. You can't be both for and against Israel on this. It will only strengthen Israel's enemies if you try to split hairs on this issue.
I agree . Which is why this right-wing coalition needs to disband and a new Israeli government needs to take control , one that can be on-message when it comes to security, diplomacy AND morality.
This situation is unsustainable. And as the fighting begins to dissipate (at least in Gaza), we'll be seeing more and more Israelis calling for such a change over the coming weeks. It can't come soon enough.
Perhaps the best posture to hold on this is to follow the Ben-Gurion model. When the British adopted the infamous 1939 White Paper, restricting Jewish immigration to Palestine, just as World War Two was breaking out:
Ben‐Gurion put it this way: “We shall fight in the war against Hitler as if there were no White Paper, but we shall fight the White Paper as if there were no war.”
Israel and the Jewish people are facing existential threats that are both external and internal. Both need to be fought with equal passion and determination.
We shall fight the South African libel as if our own ministers were not promoting unspeakable measures of their own.
And vice versa. |
No comments:
Post a Comment